Archive for November, 2007

Espresso machines cut break times

Thursday, November 29th, 2007

The Sunday Telegraph,
By Miawling Lam

The humble cappuccino has joined the cigarette and the Internet as the latest threat to workplace productivity.

Coffee runs have become the new smoko and businesses have become so fed up with workers leaving their desks in search of a caffeine fix that many are now paying for professional coffee machines to be installed on-site.

Shelling out $6000 for an espresso machine is worth it because it keeps employees in the building, keeps them motivated and cuts down on break time, employers argue.

Mitsubishi Sydney City, Hawkesbury Valley Holden, Babcock & Brown, global business and technology services company EDS and international shipping firm Maersk are among leading firms that have recently bought coffee machines for staff.

Adam Symon is the director at Bravo Repair Centre and maintains and fixes hundreds of machines each week.

“We’ve really noticed that, percentage-wise, the number of companies who are dealing with machines has tripled over the last six months,”
he said.

“A lot of money is being spent on these coffee machines. The more serious companies are even getting them plumbed into the water system.”

Mr Symon estimates that in a standard office of 300 staff, workers were grinding their way through 15kg of coffee beans each week, enough to make around 1800 standard cups.

He adds that considering the time lost when staff walks to the cafe, line up and waits for their individual brews to be made, the initial outlay on machines for companies is next to nothing.

“Over the life of the machine, it pays for itself in terms of productivity and staff happiness,” he said.

“It’s a major thing for staff to be able to come in to work and grab their coffee in the morning. They tend to be more relaxed and get stuck into their work more.”

A 2005 study conducted by human resources firm Talent2 found coffee drinkers were costing Australian businesses more than $1.8 billion in lost productivity each year.

Of the 700 surveyed, more than half estimated each trip to the barista took less than 10 minutes, while seven per cent said it took 20 minutes
or more.

Marion Levitt, director of Nimue Skin Technology, says she bought a Saeco Magic De Luxe coffee machine, valued at $999, for her 14 workers late last year.

Although she admits it was primarily bought to save her employees money, she has now noticed that nobody leaves the office unless it’s their lunch break.

“We had a coffee van that used to come around and everybody would leave at once to go down,” she said.

“It would end up being a 15- to 30-minute procedure because the queue was that long. Now with the machine, everybody’s using it and it creates a sense of togetherness.”

Recruitment Gone Mad !

Wednesday, November 21st, 2007

Article from: news.com.au

  • Job candidates asked to sing, dance &act
  • Potential ‘humiliation’ and ‘embarrassment’
  • Companies at risk of discrimination

    recruitment gone madA HARDWARE store seeking new staff asked job applicants to dance to the Jackson Five’s Blame It On The Boogie before answering formal questions during a job interview.

    One person involved described the process as “humiliating and embarrassing”.

    Candidates for positions with an IT company were reportedly taken to dinner and assessed on their manners - if they put salt or pepper on their food before tasting it they were automatically rejected.

    And an accounting firm made prospective employees take part in a game of volleyball to see how good they were at team work.

    As companies try to find the best staff - and to stand out as fun and innovative employers - job candidates are being asked to do increasingly weird things at job interviews.

    And as a result job hunters are left feeling uncomfortable and confused, and some feel they’re being discriminated against.
    Has Recruitment gone Mad ?…. To view the full article, click:

  • Online Job Advertisements

    Friday, November 16th, 2007

    It is no secret that every company and every recruiter utilises online job boards whether that be:

    secret of success

  • Seek
  • My Career
  • Career One
  • Or an alternative source

  • Where the secret of success lies is how the ad is structured. Look at it from your perspective. If you saw an advertisement for a position within your company would it entice you to apply or would you skip over it for the next role.

    It is important to understand what it is candidates are looking for, what attracts them first and foremost to a position description. Gone are the days of vague advertising such as “Mechanical Engineers wanted - Great Salary Packages available”

    Current candidates are smarter and have less time on their hands. They want to know exactly what they are applying for and what benefits are being offered before applying.

    So in order for the best candidates to be sourced, it is ideal that you supply the following:

  • Full job description - According to a recent survey completed by SEEK Intelligence candidates listed job description and responsibilities as the most important information found in a job ad.
  • Salary Information - Salary information included in an online job ad will automatically put it ahead of all ads that do not include the salary
  • What do you LOVE about your current role?

    Wednesday, November 14th, 2007

    The latest research from Seek Intelligence suggests that the following are the most important to you in relation to your job (in order of most important):

    love1. The people you work with
    2. Hours of work
    3. Variety & content of work
    4. Benefits/Conditions
    5. Workplace Environment
    6. Salary
    7. Job Security
    8. Your Boss
    9. Access to Training or Skills Development
    10. Career Development
    11. Feedback / Appreciation
    12. Stress Levels
    13. Quality of Management

    We are always on the search for the perfect match between employer and employee so we would love your feedback.

    Do you think the above list is correct? Is there anything you think should be added?

    Click on the comments section to share your thoughts.

    Fit in while not falling over:

    Monday, November 12th, 2007

    Article from: written by:
    July 26, 2007 11:09am

    fit in while in the officeGOING to happy hour with your colleagues is a great way to get to know each other. But be careful how much you indulge.

    Once you’ve been nicknamed the office lush, removing that label is a difficult task.

    “It’s one thing to have a drink and a laugh, but it’s another thing to get blitzed,” says Michael Ball, founder of CareerFreshman.com, a company that teaches employers how to manage recent graduates.

    Negotiating work drinks can be tricky for younger employees. “You’re re-learning a behavior. In college, getting drunk is rewarded. But when you’re in a workplace, there are different consequences.”

    That’s why Brian Krueger, president of the job site Collegegrad.com, has specific rules for drinking with colleagues and at work-sponsored events.

    “The right number of drinks, depending on who you are, is zero or one,” he says.

    “The one-drink limit is for the person who can nurse a drink. If you’re not good at knowing when to stop, don’t have any alcoholic drinks.”

    Mr Krueger suggests being equally cautious on job interviews. He says it’s not unusual for interviewers to take a candidate out for lunch or dinner and suggest they both order a drink. When the interviewee’s glass is empty, the interviewer offers another.

    He says it’s a test. “They want to see if you’re grown up or still in party mode.”

    There is a middle ground. At the advertising agency MRM Worldwide, the human resources department discusses with new hires what is acceptable and what isn’t when drinking at office events.

    The agency’s office provides its 34 employees with beer and wine at its monthly staff meetings.

    That may seem surprising, but managers there consider it a way to celebrate accomplishments and talk openly in a relaxed environment.

    “It’s not so corporate, so people do feel a bit more free to be themselves as opposed to a corporate environment, where it’s stuffy,” says Fern Stanford, a HR manager at MRM Worldwide.

    While some new hires might think it’s equivalent to an open bar, it’s decidedly not. There’s a no-tolerance policy when it comes to employees drinking too much and acting disorderly. Ms Stanford says someone who does that will likely get fired.

    If getting fired isn’t the consequence, there are still ramifications. Being labeled the office partier will likely result in less desirable assignments and a reluctance to let you work independently.

    “Your business reputation is porcelain, not rubber,” says Mr Ball. “Drop it once and it’s broken.”


    RSS to JavaScript